Attribute |
Definition |
How we build it |
Journal Business Models |
|
|
Fully Open Access (OA) |
A journal that publishes only in open access.
|
We follow Unpaywall’s approach on defining fully Open Access journals and publishers and we construct the lists of the latter using Unpaywall data.
In brief, a journal is fully Open Access if one or more of the following occur:
- It is in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- It has a known fully OA Publisher (curated list).
- It only publishes OA articles.
|
Subscription |
A journal that charges for access to its articles.
|
Journals without any open access articles. |
Hybrid |
A subscription journal where some of its articles are open access.
|
Journals with open access articles that are not fully OA journals. |
Transformative |
"A Transformative Journal is a subscription/hybrid journal that is actively committed to transitioning to a fully Open Access journal.
In addition, a Transformative Journal must:
- gradually increase the share of Open Access content; and
- offset subscription income from payments for publishing services (to avoid double payments)."
Source: Plan S initiative
|
We identify Transformative Journals by ISSN matching with the publicly available Transformative Journals data from Plan S initiative. |
Under transformative agreements |
Transformative agreements are those contracts negotiated between institutions (libraries, national and regional consortia) and publishers that transform the business model underlying scholarly journal publishing, moving from one based on toll access (subscription) to one in which publishers are remunerated a fair price for their open access publishing services.
Source: Plan S initiative
|
We identify and retrieve from OpenAPC the set of articles with metadata published under transformative agreements . |
Journal APC Business Models |
|
|
Diamond OA |
A fully OA journal that does not charge article processing charges (APCs).
In other words, fully OA journals are either diamond, or charge APCs.
|
We obtain APC data from DOAJ using DOAJ’s Public Data Dump (an exportable version of the journal metadata). We used it to determine whether a particular fully OA journal charges APCs. |
Routes to Open Access (OA) |
|
|
Green OA |
An open access scholarly publication deposited in a repository
|
As in definition. |
Gold OA |
A scholarly publication published in a fully OA journal.
|
We define fully OA journals above. |
Hybrid OA |
An open access scholarly publication published in a hybrid journal with an open license.
|
We define hybrid journals above.
At this point we consider only CC licenses “open”. We are currently working on cleaning non-CC licenses as well to identify other open ones.
In principle, this means that we may be underestimating the number of hybrid OA articles and overestimating the number of bronze.
|
Bronze OA |
An open access scholarly publication published in a hybrid journal without an open license.
|
|
Composite Scores |
|
|
Openness Score |
A measure representing the proportion of an organization's research that is available in Open Access. |
We calculate this metric by taking the average share of an organization’s research output that is in Open Access. This score is determined based on the best available access rights for any given output in the OpenAIRE Graph after undergoing the Graph Production Workflow including merging, enrichment and cleaning steps. For example, if a publication is published under closed access but can also be found in open access in a repository, it will be categorized as open access for the purposes of this score. |
Findability Score |
A metric indicating the proportion of an organization's research output identifiable by a Persistent Identifier (PID).
|
We calculate this metric by taking the average share of an organization's research output with a Persistent Identifier (PID) in its metadata record within the OpenAIRE Graph, after it undergoing the Graph Production Workflow, comprising of merging, enrichment, and cleaning steps. For more detailed criteria on PIDs within the OpenAIRE Graph, refer to OpenAIRE's PID and Identifiers documentation. |
FAIRness Score
|
A metric demonstrating the presence of critical metadata elements in an organization's research output, including the Title, Publisher, Abstract, Year of Publication, Author(s), and a Persistent Identifier (PID). It signifies the presence of metadata not its quality, with the exception of PIDs which have specific inclusion criteria.
|
We calculate this metric by taking the average share of an organization's research output with essential metadata criteria; specifically the presence of a Title, Publisher, Abstract, Year of Publication, Author(s), and a Persistent Identifier (PID). While the score indicates the presence of these metadata elements, it does not assess their quality, with the exception of PIDs that have unique inclusion criteria in the OpenAIRE Graph, as detailed in OpenAIRE's PID and Identifiers documentation. The score represents the state of the organization’s research output metadata records in the OpenAIRE Graph after undergoing the Graph Production Workflow, encompassing merging, enrichment, and cleaning procedures. Please see OpenAIRE's Graph Production Workflow. |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
Peer Reviewed Publication |
A peer reviewed publication is a scholarly article that has been evaluated and critiqued by independent experts in the same field before being published. This method is widely used by academic journals to enhance the credibility and reliability of published research. |
A publication is peer-reviewed if either of the following criteria is true.
- Curated Peer-Review Assessment: The OpenAIRE team has engaged in a curation process to determine peer-review status. This hand-curated assessment has been integrated into the Graph and is continuously under development.
- Exclusion of Grey Literature: We filter out grey literature, which includes document types that typically bypass the peer review process, such as reports, and white papers. Given that the OpenAIRE Graph aggregates data from various sources, resulting in merged records, we specifically exclude entries where all instances are identified as grey literature.
& Presence of DOI from Crossref: Since Crossref predominantly catalogues peer-reviewed content, its DOIs help maintain the scholarly credibility of our included publications.
|
Downloads |
The number of downloads of a publication’s full text in a specific time frame, from a given set of data sources.
|
We utilize the usage data for the downloads from OpenAIRE’s Usage Counts service that harvests it from a set of datasources. The time range of available downloads varies for each datasource. |
Citations |
The number of citations received by a publication. A citation is a reference to the source of information used in a publication.
|
We utilize the number of citations of a publication from from the calculated impact indicators, provided by BIP!. Precisely, we use the Citation Count (CC) impact indicator, which sums all citations received by each article. More information: https://graph.openaire.eu/docs/graph-production-workflow/indicators-ingestion/impact-indicators/ |
Interdisciplinarity |
Interdisciplinarity refers to research that integrates knowledge, methods, or perspectives from multiple distinct fields of science. For this indicator, a publication is considered interdisciplinary if it is classified under more than one FoS level 3 category (indicator = 1). |
We apply a hierarchical Fields of Science (FoS) classification, assigning each publication to one or more FoS level 3 fields. If more than one level 3 field is assigned, the publication is marked as interdisciplinary. More information: https://explore.openaire.eu/fields-of-science
Breakdown by Fields of Science (FoS): Several indicators are also shown broken down by FoS level 1 or FoS level 2 using our FoS classification system, providing broader insights into major disciplines and subfields.
|